=== Testing with problem_count=10, nodes=100, capacity=10
Ford-Fulkerson:	    0.00019723s
Edmonds-Karp:	    0.00017104s
Dinic:				0.00114540s
Goldberg-Tarjan:	0.11118784s

=== Testing with problem_count=10, nodes=100, capacity=100
Ford-Fulkerson:	    0.00044646s
Edmonds-Karp:	    0.00030087s
Dinic:				0.00212037s
Goldberg-Tarjan:	0.15394399s

=== Testing with problem_count=10, nodes=100, capacity=1000
Ford-Fulkerson:	    0.00028169s
Edmonds-Karp:	    0.00017956s
Dinic:				0.00128019s
Goldberg-Tarjan:	0.11455003s

=== Testing with problem_count=10, nodes=200, capacity=10
Ford-Fulkerson:	    0.00057035s
Edmonds-Karp:	    0.00042638s
Dinic:				0.00270890s
Goldberg-Tarjan:	1.70483265s

=== Testing with problem_count=10, nodes=200, capacity=100
Ford-Fulkerson:	    0.00121046s
Edmonds-Karp:	    0.00045426s
Dinic:				0.00301752s
Goldberg-Tarjan:	1.48397911s

=== Testing with problem_count=10, nodes=200, capacity=1000
Ford-Fulkerson:	    0.00183244s
Edmonds-Karp:	    0.00062984s
Dinic:				0.00411386s
Goldberg-Tarjan:	1.49089764s

=== Testing with problem_count=10, nodes=300, capacity=10
Ford-Fulkerson:	    0.00086230s
Edmonds-Karp:	    0.00071712s
Dinic:				0.00423448s
Goldberg-Tarjan:	5.84010118s

=== Testing with problem_count=10, nodes=300, capacity=100
Ford-Fulkerson:	    0.00164213s
Edmonds-Karp:	    0.00040957s
Dinic:				0.00322493s
Goldberg-Tarjan:	1.97116912s

=== Testing with problem_count=10, nodes=300, capacity=1000
Ford-Fulkerson:	    0.00362413s
Edmonds-Karp:	    0.00094858s
Dinic:				0.00600265s
Goldberg-Tarjan:	5.16341617s